Aggressive Advocates For Your Rights

May 2012 Archives

Finding Injuries and Forgetting People in New Jersey.

What happens when an attorney does not name every party who may be responsible in a medical malpractice suit? Does forgetting a person rise to the level of legal malpractice?Dellaquila v. Bendit Weinstock P.A., A-5268-10T4, 2012 WL 1581219 (N.J. Super.Ct. App. Div. May 8, 2012), is a case which deals with this issue as well as how forgetting a person interacts with the statute of limitations which has previously been discussed on this blog.

Of Suits and Settlements in Pennsylvania.

Jan Rubin Association Inc. v. Nixon Peabody LLP, 2008 WL 4106694 (Pa. Com. Pl. June Term 2007) is aPennsylvania case which examines settlements in the same way earlierNew Jersey cases have. Most importantly, the case shows that settlements, even if signed, will not prevent a legal malpractice suit. However, often times, there may be another condition which does indeed prevent the suit.

The Rule, not the Exception.

Smith v. Grayson, A-1072-10T4, October 17, 2011, (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2011) is a case which details 3 main points. The first point demonstrates the limits of the Puderdoctrine, outlining when a settlement may be ripe for a malpractice suit. The second point concerns the basis of attorney opinions in malpractice suits. Finally, the case deals with 3rdparty malpractice liability, such as when a defendant attorney retains consultant counsel to help with a case.

Protecting Legal Consumers.

In the context of attorney-client relationships, people often forget that a client is a consumer of legal services. Given the scope of this definition of consumer, it is inevitable that a client may attempt to bring a cause of action under consumer protection laws in addition to common law malpractice. Beyers v. Richmond, 594 Pa. 654 (2007) is an interesting case which considers the applicability of consumer protection statutes to legal representation which may be more deficient than allowable.

Better Safe than Sorry.

Swain v. Alterman, A-4214-10T4, 2011 WL 6112126 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. December 9, 2011) is an important case inNew Jersey for legal malpractice plaintiffs who do not properly procure an affidavit of merit. The affidavit of merit is a letter from another attorney stating that the defendant attorney did not uphold his duty as required by the profession.

request free consultation

Get Your Questions Answered within 24 hours

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Morton Office
7 South Morton Avenue
Morton, PA 19070

Toll Free: 866-570-6945
Phone: 484-842-4030
Fax: 610-690-0880
Morton Law Office Map

Philadelphia Office
1500 Walnut Street, Suite 2000
Philadelphia, PA 19102

Toll Free: 866-570-6945
Phone: 484-842-4030
Philadelphia Law Office Map

Review Us
map image
map image