Aggressive Advocates For Your Rights

What are the six conditions of fraudulent misrepresentation?

Fraudulent misrepresentation is the most serious form of misrepresentation and, therefore, the most difficult to prove. In business disputes, fraudulent misrepresentation can lead to major financial losses and for consumers it can mean being cheated out of receiving a good or service they have otherwise been promised. To prove fraudulent misrepresentation has occurred, six conditions must be met.

1. A representation was made

Obviously, a representation must be made in a case alleging fraudulent misrepresentation. The representation must be a factual claim. Mere puffery does not count as a representation. So a factual representation could include a car dealer saying a certain car gets 30 miles per gallon, but would not include a more subjective claim, such as "This car will change your life!"

2. The claim was false

Furthermore, the representation that was made must be shown to be false. So if, returning to the above example, a car that is advertised as getting 30 miles per gallon actually only get 25 miles per gallon, evidence would need to be provided of the car's actual fuel efficiency.

3. The claim was known to be false

The person or business making the claim also must have have known the claim was false or should have known the claim was false. Furthermore, the party making the claim cannot deliberately avoid finding out the truth of a claim and then claim ignorance because he or she failed to verify the claim.

4. The plaintiff relied on the information

It is not enough that a false claim was made by the defendant in order to prove fraudulent misrepresentation. Furthermore, the plaintiff in the case must show that the false claim that was made was also an important factor in his or her decision to complete the transaction. Again, the consumer alleging fraudulent misrepresentation against a car dealer would have to show that the car's gas mileage was a factor in his or her decision to purchase the vehicle.

5. Made with the intention of influencing the plaintiff

Likewise, the claim must also have been made with the intention of convincing the plaintiff to take a certain course of action. In cases involving businesses, such false claims are often made with the intention of getting people to agree to a deal they would not have otherwise agreed to, such as overvaluing a business that is up for sale.

6. The plaintiff suffered a material loss

Finally, the misrepresentation must have led to a loss for the plaintiff. Proving that a loss occurred is very important, especially since it allows the plaintiff to claim damages to recompense him or her for that loss.

If you have been the victim of possible fraudulent misrepresentation then you need an attorney who has the experience and dedication to fight for your case. The legal team at Weisberg Law has handled many cases involving misrepresentation. Contact them today to find out how they may be able to put that experience to work for you.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
request free consultation

Get Your Questions Answered within 24 hours

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Review Us

Morton Office
7 South Morton Avenue
Morton, PA 19070

Toll Free: 866-570-6945
Phone: 484-842-4030
Fax: 610-690-0880
Morton Law Office Map

Philadelphia Office
1500 Walnut Street, Suite 2000
Philadelphia, PA 19102

Toll Free: 866-570-6945
Phone: 484-842-4030
Philadelphia Law Office Map

map image
map image